![]() ![]() Customize keyboard / DAW & Control Change You can customize the features of your Midi Keyboard to control Speed, Texture and Dynamics of all Scenes selectively, matching “Note On”, “Velocity On”, “After Touch”, “Pitch Bend” and even the “Control Change” with your DAW. ![]() Sync MIDI to VISUAL EFFECTS like never before You can choose Media speed and Rendering rate, based on your hardware. It can be used in professional settings as well as for personal enjoyment, to create video effects with interactive animation for concerts, theater, art installations, movies, advertising, parties, education and more!īlazingly fast OpenGL-based on 2D and 3D rendering with maps, your images or though the Live Video. ![]() I'd have to look into it to see if it could be like a smaller version of the Apollo II.A standalone Audio Visualizer! DiscoBrick MIDI creates dazzling visual effects by reacting to the audio that is captured by your MIDI / MPE Devices and also by the built-in mic. You can't really do arpeggios à la Radiohead, where you really hear the movement of the phaser. And sadly, the sweep is not as noticeable as with the Apollo II. It would have been perfect if they had given the opportunity to also choose 4 stages. It doesn't do everything, but it does a lot of things if you take the time to adjust each knob. As always with Diamond, it is an impeccable pedal. If I didn't already have a Cali76 CD, I would be looking for the Drybell Unit 67.įinally, I did manage to find a Diamond Phase PHS1. Its noise floor is incredibly low, but it may be due to the fact that it is based on photo-cells (I guess). Of course, it is very different from the above phasers. Sadly, there is a low pitched clock noise that makes it unusable for me. I also tried the MXR 1974 vintage script. The drummer (and the guitarist) would have to be machines to stick to the tempo. ![]() The waveforms are so rhythmic that they seem almost impossible to use live in a band. I wish they would have made a smaller version without all the waveforms and rhythmic patterns, for which I have no use. It shines on arpeggios as well as on chords. The phasing can be very deep and it has a full sweep from lows to highs. The Quasar v4 sounds not bad, but it is really TOO NOISY! I don´t know a thing about pedal designing, but it is incredible the difference in noise from one pedal to another, as if some designers don't care at all about noise. And from all the phasers I've tried, it is not the best sounding. There is a high pitched woosh, even with low regeneration, that bothers me. I haven't been impressed by the Grand Orbiter v3. So here is an account of my latest comparison: This can be done economically, but is often overlooked in clones and knockoffs. It takes a good basic design, decent filtering at the pedals' power input, careful attention during PCB layout and routing, and a good LFO design to preclude noise in a phaser. IMO, it ABSOLUTELY does NOT take a high-end pedal to be 'quiet'. the PSU may be outputting noise that a phaser is picking up. IF the noise is still there, double-check the PSU by using a battery attached to a 2.1 mm barrel connector. IF the noise is gone, then consider putting the phaser on it's own power tap, or work through a process of elimination to determine which other pedal is causing electrical noise : move that other pedal to it's own tap. reduce the setup to just guitar> phaser> amp If you are experiencing other noise when using a phaser, try the following An alternative is to put a light amount of distortion right before the phaser, and trigger both on a Loop (so the distortion is not on at all times). A certain amount of edgy noise can be added to any phase circuit, but it has to be built in. The amount of builtin distortion is up to the circuit designer. OTA amps, and the manner in which a phase/filter-ladder is implemented with them, can yield a very clean sound. OR a very dirty sounding unit like the old Maestro Stage Phaser (it seems to have a bit of distortion built in). To me, they tend to be the 'cleanest' sounding phasers (along with optical phasers like the MuTron and Morley chrome)īut your comments seem to be negative towards clean-sounding phasers.īTW, I personally prefer either a very clean phaser, like the Small Stone or the Grand Orbiter May I ask why you think your ideal phaser would be an OTA? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |